Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fayetteville Housing Authority raises security deposit policy, updates bylaws and hires Rose Law Firm
Summary
The board approved a new security‑deposit procedure (raising the standard $50 deposit for future tenants), bylaw amendments removing the resident‑commissioner designation while preserving resident engagement, and a contract with Rose Law Firm for legal services; votes were recorded on multiple resolutions.
Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Fayetteville Housing Authority board voted to approve several administrative changes: a revised security‑deposit procedure, amendments to the authority’s bylaws, and a contract for legal services with Rose Law Firm.
Shonda and Tara explained the security deposit proposal (resolution 13 76) to increase the standard deposit for future residents because the existing $50 payment does not cover typical make‑ready and repair costs. Tara said the deposit would be refundable based on how the unit is left and staff would provide an itemized list of deductions when appropriate: "The deposit is refundable based on how the unit's left," Tara said. Commissioners asked how the policy would accommodate families who cannot pay an increased deposit; Shonda said staff will work with families and local partner agencies (community action, nonprofits, churches or ESG/CDBG funding when available) to avoid creating barriers to housing.
Board members then considered bylaw amendments (resolution 13 77) intended to modernize governance and align procedures with Arkansas law. The largest substantive change removes the requirement to designate a resident commissioner in the bylaws — a shift driven by the authority’s evolving portfolio (RAD conversions and an increased share of voucher‑based assistance). The board clarified that Commissioner Humphrey, the current resident commissioner, would retain a board seat and voting rights but the title would change to a board commissioner.
Finally, the board approved resolution 13 78 to enter into a legal‑services agreement using a piggyback procurement with Rose Law Firm (the firm had previously appeared in procurement documents under the Cross, Gunter, Witherspoon name). Shonda explained that the arrangement is allowed under federal purchasing rules (24 CFR 200.318(e)) and that client billing will be by time (no monthly retainer was proposed).
Votes: the board moved and approved the resolutions on voice votes with named commissioners recorded as Aye in the transcript for each action. The meeting record shows Commissioners Cole, Deutsch, Nathan and Moore recorded as Aye on the resolutions discussed during the meeting.
Staff said they will monitor whether the changed deposit policy creates access issues and will work with community partners to provide deposit assistance when needed. The board scheduled its next meeting for January 22, 2026.
