Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Farm To School topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Report: meeting 50% local sourcing in schools will require processing, storage and long‑term contracts

Water & Natural Resources · November 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A multi‑agency work group recommended investments in processing, cold storage, aggregation and contract purchasing to achieve a goal of sourcing 50% of K‑12 beef, milk, cheese and produce from New Mexico producers. NMDA, PED and industry said capacity gaps — not raw production — are the main barriers.

A state work group convened under Senate Memorial 19 concluded that New Mexico can expand local purchasing for school meals but only if the state invests in processing, packaging, aggregation and distribution infrastructure.

Jason New, division director for marketing and development at the New Mexico Department of Agriculture, summarized the report and said the memorial aligns with the administration's broader food‑initiative goals: promoting local food systems, economic resilience and food security. New noted New Mexico's strengths — large cattle inventories and a notable dairy industry — and its constraints: limited in‑state finishing and USDA‑inspected processing capacity and a small produce acreage base.

The work group estimated that meeting a 50% sourcing target for beef would require roughly the equivalent of several thousand head annually (speaker figures estimated ~4,600 head or the equivalent poundage) and that schools would need sustained, predictable purchasing commitments to justify private investment in plant upgrades. New told the committee that some processors said separating 100% New Mexico milk from regional milk streams is commercially difficult without contract commitments from institutional buyers.

Nayeli Madrid, office manager for USA Beef Packing, highlighted that her USDA‑inspected plant can process tens of thousands of pounds per day and has an adjacent 40,000‑square‑foot cold‑storage facility; at current operating levels the plant runs at about 25% capacity. "We can produce 2,000 pounds per day of finished product... we have room to use [cold storage] as a distribution facility for the SM19 50% demand," Madrid said, adding that upgrades and consistent school purchasing would allow scaling.

Michael Chavez of the Public Education Department said New Mexico served 56 million school meals in 2024–25 and that less than 4% of those food budgets were spent on locally sourced items. He warned that USDA commodity programs and low subsidized prices make it difficult for local producers to compete without parallel incentives and procurement changes.

Elena Paesano from the New Mexico Farmers Marketing Association described the Approved Supplier Program that has broadened access for small farms (roughly 250 approved suppliers) by providing low‑cost food‑safety compliance and technical assistance; the program has been a critical entry point for producers to sell to schools and senior programs.

The report's recommendations include targeted investments in aggregation hubs, cold chain and wash/pack capacity for produce, expanded small‑plant upgrades for USDA inspection and cut‑and‑wrap capability for cheese and meat, simplified procurement for schools with multiyear forward contracts, and sustained funding for New Mexico Grown and the Approved Supplier program. Committee members asked the agencies to return with clearer cost estimates for infrastructure investments and proposals for phased funding.