Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Questions And Concerns topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board raises math performance, overcrowding and special‑education funding concerns after elementary reports
Summary
During Q&A following elementary site council presentations, board members pressed staff on early‑grade math scores, a school’s overcrowding and heavy special‑education caseloads; a board member said fuller special‑education funding would ease pressures.
After the district’s elementary site council reports, board members asked for clarification on assessment trends and resource pressures.
Board member Katie said the literacy gains were visible in the packet but asked why early elementary math scores appeared low; presenters said fall scores are used as baselines, summer learning loss is a factor and the district is adapting professional learning strategies used in literacy to support math instruction. Presenters noted that some buildings have highlighted progress in math fact fluency and that ongoing PLCs and coaching target those areas.
Board members also discussed school safety partnerships and staffing. Presenters described a School Resource Officer who has worked with assemblies, dismissal procedures and family engagement; the district said the Pottawatomie County Sheriff Department supports rotations across schools and that the officer is a community presence for some buildings.
Sheila (identified in the transcript without a last name) described overcrowding pressures at her building: while some class sizes are smaller than last year, fourth‑ and fifth‑grade classes remain high and special‑education caseloads (including speech and IRC rooms) are among the district’s largest. She said the district expects additional help next year but recruitment for special‑education positions is challenging.
Board member Lou tied those building pressures to broader funding concerns, saying that full funding of special education would relieve much of the strain; he referenced a transcribed figure ('freed up a $138,000,000') when describing the scale of the funding gap and said that full restoration of special‑education funding is unlikely but would materially reduce local budget pressure.
No formal board directives or votes on these issues were recorded in the portion of the meeting covered here. Board members asked staff to continue monitoring assessment results and building needs as budget work proceeds.
