Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections And Staffing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cottonwood Heights CDRA approves resolution electing officers and appointing staff

Cottonwood Heights Community Development and Redevelopment Agency (CDRA) · January 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Cottonwood Heights Community Development and Redevelopment Agency on Jan. 20 approved Resolution 2026-01 to elect officers and appoint staff by a 5–0 roll-call vote; the body also reviewed the minutes-approval process and then adjourned.

Cottonwood Heights’ Community Development and Redevelopment Agency approved Resolution 2026-01, electing officers and appointing staff, at its Jan. 20, 2026 meeting by a 5–0 roll-call vote.

The measure, introduced as the first action item, was moved to approve and was, as the meeting host announced, “Motion to approve by council member Newell, seconded by council member Holton.” The roll call recorded affirmative votes from Council Member Newell; Council Member Holton; Board Member Dunyan; Board Member Hyland; and Board Member Burrell. The meeting host stated that they did not vote on the item.

The resolution was presented to the board as a housekeeping action prompted by recent changes in the city’s elected officers. Following the vote, the host said they would turn the meeting over to the newly designated chairperson.

Separately, an agency staff member outlined the process for approving the minutes of this meeting: “the agency secretary promptly will circulate a draft copy of the minutes to the board members, who then will have 3 business days to provide any proposed corrections to the secretary. The secretary will then circulate a revised draft of the minutes to the board members, and the same review process will continue until such time as no corrections to the draft minutes are received within [the] 3 business day review period, whereupon that draft of the minutes will be deemed approved and will become the final minutes of this meeting.”

The meeting concluded with a motion to adjourn, which was seconded and approved by voice vote.

No staff appointments or specific officer names beyond those recorded in the roll call were detailed in the meeting record provided.