Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development Study topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council refines scope for Provo economic development study; staff to prepare RFP

Provo Municipal Council · January 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff presented a draft scope for a Provo economic development study; councilors urged a deeper diagnostic, clearer goals and ROI metrics, and recommended preparing an RFP (with in‑house groundwork) so a consultant can be engaged quickly.

City staff presented a draft scope of work for a Provo economic development study and asked council for direction on goals, in‑house responsibilities and whether to hire a consultant. Cody Hill, the city’s vision director for economic development, said staff had circulated a proposed scope and sought council feedback so the final scope and deliverable meet the council’s expectations.

Several councilors, notably Jeff Whitlock, urged the study to prioritize a rigorous diagnostic that goes beyond surface description — including sectoral growth/decline, firm‑level dynamics, leading indicators and a clear narrative for Provo’s competitive advantages. Vice Chair Craig Christiansen and others emphasized the need for a short list of return‑on‑investment indicators (for example, impact on Area Median Income, taxable revenue or other concrete metrics) to guide eventual decisions and to define decision gates where council votes will be required.

Staff suggested preparing an RFP and using in‑house work to produce sufficient background so an outside consultant can begin efficiently. Council members favored a mixed approach: some in‑house analysis to inform an RFP, then a consultant to provide an outside perspective and deeper analysis. Staff said they will draft the RFP language and bring it back for council review before issuance.