Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norfolk planning staff seek formal start to replace Plan Norfolk 2030 with NFK 2050
Summary
Planning staff told the commission they expect a near‑final draft of the city's comprehensive plan in early September and asked the panel to initiate repeal of Plan Norfolk 2030 and adoption of NFK 2050 so the schedule can move to public hearings this fall.
Planning staff on Aug. 14 asked the Norfolk Planning Commission to initiate a formal amendment that would repeal the city's Plan Norfolk 2030 and begin the adoption process for a new comprehensive plan, NFK 2050. The staff presentation described recent public engagement, the structure of the draft plan and a proposed timetable that would put a Planning Commission recommendation on Sept. 25 and the earliest City Council consideration on Oct. 28.
A staff presenter described four public open houses in June, an online survey run from June 30 through July 21, and ten city locations where printed copies of the draft were left for public comment. "We had the public draft in May, we did four open houses in June and an online survey," the presenter said during the briefing, and added staff consolidated community feedback and completed a final round of edits with the consultant.
Commissioners pressed staff on how the document's goals and actions will be tracked after adoption. One commissioner urged making implementation metrics a standing update: "We need a scoreboard. How are we doing? Are we winning? Are we falling behind?" the commissioner said, calling for a matrix of short‑, medium‑ and long‑term items and public dashboards. Staff said they were working on a matrix and metrics that could be displayed online and used internally to monitor short‑term deliverables.
Staff outlined next procedural steps: they intend to place initiation of the repeal/adoption on the Aug. 28 new business agenda; if initiated, the earliest Planning Commission recommendation hearing would be Sept. 25 and the earliest City Council hearing would be Oct. 28, though staff cautioned timing could shift as final edits are completed.
The presentation emphasized the plan's structure: an executive summary and background, a vision and framework shaped by community engagement, a future land‑use map and four pillars (celebrating community, growing equitably, embracing nature, and connecting the city), followed by an implementation chapter with an actions matrix listing lead and support departments and time horizons. Staff said a full community engagement summary will be placed in an appendix to keep the main document focused on goals and actions.
Next steps: the commission will be asked to vote to initiate the amendment at the Aug. 28 meeting so staff can continue refining the draft for the public hearing cycle; staff plan to deliver a near‑final version in early September, subject to consultant revisions.
