Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Capacity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff brief commissioners on school-capacity rules and student-generation rates
Summary
Land Use staff reviewed the county’s Adequate Public Facilities rules (CZO ch. 70 §70-11), student-generation rates set by resolution in 2008, and systemwide capacity figures through Dec. 31, 2025; staff noted systemwide capacity remains available but localized concentrations of development (Leonardtown, Lexington Park) can create school crowding.
Get email alerts on the Education Capacity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On Jan. 27 county planning staff presented an overview of the Adequate Public Facilities (APF) program as it relates to school capacity and allocation of development-related student slots.
Miss Andritz said APF rules are contained in Chapter 70 of the county zoning ordinance, with section 70-11 addressing school capacity. The presentation summarized the county’s adopted student-generation rates (established by resolutions in 2003 and confirmed in 2008) and explained the capacity thresholds that the ordinance uses: 107% of state-rated capacity for elementary schools (north/south split), 109% for middle schools and 116% for high schools, measured systemwide as part of APF determinations.
Staff noted that the enrollment data used for APF calculations are provided by St. Mary’s County Public Schools and that the county’s current analysis is based on the most recent complete dataset (through Dec. 31, 2025). Miss Andritz acknowledged that the 2026 enrollment census was not yet available for inclusion in the slides and cautioned that localized concentrations of new housing development can produce overcrowding at particular schools even when the systemwide figures appear adequate. Commissioners discussed redistricting and whether municipal annexations (for example, Leonardtown) create gaps in county APF coverage; staff said municipalities can have separate processes and that board of education redistricting remains a key factor.
No formal action was taken; the briefing was provided for information and staff said they would continue to coordinate APF allocations with Board of Education enrollment data as it becomes available.

