Prosser board approves vouchers, superintendent goals, lease and Highly Capable plan

Prosser School District Board of Directors · January 29, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the regular meeting the board approved vouchers, the 2025–26 superintendent goals, a 2025 lease agreement for the Missimer/OIE property, the 2025–26 Highly Capable district plan, and consent items A–C; most motions passed by voice vote.

The Prosser School District board took multiple routine actions during the meeting, approving vouchers, the superintendent's 2025—1 goals, a 2025 lease agreement for the Missimer/OIE property, the 2025—1 Highly Capable district plan, and consent items A—C by voice vote.

- Vouchers: The board discussed a voucher tied to troubleshooting door reader programming at the high school (vendor Absco) and approved the vouchers by voice vote.

- Superintendent goals (2025—1): The board approved two goals presented by the superintendent: (1) districtwide accountability measures for staff and (2) a budget-focused goal prioritizing fiscal progress. The motion passed by voice vote.

- Lease agreement (2025): Staff reported the district used a public bid process and received a single bid from the previous lessee (Mr. Christiansen). The board approved the proposed lease agreement.

- Highly Capable district plan (2025—1): Board members reviewed and discussed services for highly capable students, including dual-credit, honors/AP, Running Start and BYU online course options. Staff explained coding and tracking for qualified students; the board approved the plan.

- Consent items: Consent agenda items A—C were moved, seconded and approved.

The transcript records voice votes and the chair announcing motions carried but does not provide a roll-call tally for these approvals. Board members asked for scheduling and reporting clarifications but did not take additional binding fiscal actions at this meeting.