Supervisors debate choosing debris-removal contractor for FEMA reimbursement; SDR’s disaster experience cited
Loading...
Summary
County staff presented multiple bids for debris removal. Board members debated awarding work to the lowest-cost bidder versus a contractor with recent FEMA disaster experience (SDR) and discussed documentation the minutes must include to accept a non-lowest bid for federal reimbursement.
County emergency-management staff reviewed debris-removal bids and urged the board to keep a short list of qualified firms with FEMA experience for rapid engagement during federally declared disasters. Staff said SDR has a large footprint and recent FEMA work, while other firms offered lower hourly bids.
"When you deal with bids, when you talk about the group management, people will be as low as bid to try to get it," the emergency-management representative said, arguing the county should prioritize companies with demonstrated FEMA experience to protect reimbursement eligibility. Several supervisors pressed for a written narrative in the minutes explaining why a higher-priced bid was chosen, a statutory requirement when accepting a non-lowest bid for government procurement and federal-reimbursement compatibility.
Board members did not finalize a full, binding contract during the meeting but moved toward maintaining a prequalified list and leaving the county able to engage vendors for federal reimbursement; staff said the action is not a binding contract and that the county could choose not to use any listed firm. The county attorney (speakers present during the discussion) reminded supervisors that minutes must show detailed calculations and narrative justification if accepting other than the lowest bid.
Next steps: staff will prepare the required documentation for the minutes and, if needed, return with a recommendation that includes a written justification of why a non-lowest bid is in the county's best interest for FEMA reimbursement.
