Parents ask CUSD 200 board for clear written policy and public guidance on immigration enforcement near schools
Summary
Three community members urged the board to adopt a transparent policy and public communication about how the district will respond if immigration enforcement (ICE/CBP) operates near school property, citing local worry, petitions and a statutory deadline they said applies.
During the public‑comment portion of the CUSD 200 board meeting on Jan. 28, three residents urged the board to develop and publicly commit to a written policy governing how schools and staff should respond when immigration enforcement operates near district schools.
Tim Kane, who said he represents more than 580 students, parents and community members who signed a petition, described reports and observed enforcement activity near schools and said informal, private conversations are insufficient. "What we're asking for is straightforward, clear written policy, public communication, and guidance so staff are not left making high pressure decisions alone," Kane said.
Rebecca Hackman, a district parent, told the board that federal guidance that once treated schools as protected spaces has been rescinded and said a written policy and public community education — including Spanish interpretation at public forums — are needed. She said her understanding is that a law with a statutory July deadline requires action and asked the board to begin a transparent policy‑creation process that includes input from families who would be most affected.
Claudia Romero reiterated requests for clear written policy, public communications and staff guidance so employees do not make high‑stakes operational decisions alone. Speakers asked for staff training and community town halls to explain operational details (for example, drop‑off and pick‑up procedures and off‑property scenarios) and asked the board to act publicly and without delay.
Board members did not adopt a policy at the meeting and did not announce a firm timeline for the board to begin drafting or approving such a policy. District administrators acknowledged the comments and offered to follow up privately and through board processes.
The public comments were the last item in the agenda excerpt provided.

