Senate passes bill letting patients limit certain electronic medical-record content amid split floor debate
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
The Senate approved a public-health measure allowing patients to opt in or opt out of including certain items in electronic medical records; supporters said it protects patient dignity and safety, while opponents warned it could impede clinicians and risk harm. The bill passed on a recorded vote.
The New York State Senate approved legislation amending the public health law to give patients greater control over certain electronic medical-record content, a measure that prompted sharp debate on the Senate floor.
Senator Morris explained his no vote, saying the law could undermine the purpose of transportable digital medical records by allowing patients to remove or limit items that clinicians need to make safe treatment decisions. "The idea that we will actually pass a law that allows people to remove things from there based on their own personal preferences, I think is contrary to public policy," Morris said, arguing clinicians could be blocked from receiving a full clinical picture.
Supporters, including Senator Fernandez, countered that the bill preserves patient autonomy and privacy. Fernandez said the bill "informs the patient as to what they are wanting to do, letting them know their rights if they can opt in and opt out" and stated the measure had backing from more than 200 medical professionals and providers. Senator Maynard described scenarios — including cross-border emergencies and gender-affirming care — where the ability to protect sensitive information could encourage people to seek care without fear.
Senator Wike invoked clinical duty of care concerns, referencing the Hippocratic Oath and saying limiting clinician access to important information "does no harm" and she recorded a no vote. The Senate recorded the roll call and the measure passed.
The session record shows sponsors' arguments for patient privacy and dignity balanced against floor statements emphasizing clinician access to critical health information. The bill was entered as passed and will proceed through the implementation steps required under law.
