Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Credits topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee reviews changes to machinery-and-equipment investment tax credit, including partial refundability

Vermont Senate Finance Committee · January 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Legislative counsel told the Senate Finance Committee a bill would remove a prior 80% cap so certain machinery-and-equipment investment tax credits could be partially refundable (refund election up to $500,000 per year) and extend program years and certification rules tied to an economic development council.

Legislative counsel briefed the Senate Finance Committee on proposed changes to the machinery-and-equipment investment tax credit, explaining the draft would (1) extend the statutory investment period, (2) broaden the definition of qualified expenditures, and (3) remove a statutory limit that currently prevents the credit from reducing a taxpayer’s Vermont income tax liability below 20% of tax due.

Under current law the credit cannot reduce corporate income tax liability by more than 80% in a single year, which prevents refunds. The proposal removes that 80% cap and allows a taxpayer to elect a refund of up to $500,000 of excess credit in a tax year; any remaining credit could still be carried forward under existing carryforward rules.

Committee members discussed how (and whether) the credit has been used historically, how corporate apportionment and the 2022 corporate tax changes affected whether affected companies pay Vermont corporate income tax, and whether the credit’s certification/administration process requires additional agency (JFO/Tax Department) review. Staff noted the statute resides under 32 VSA §5930l and related credit provisions.

No final committee action was taken on Jan. 30; committee members asked for fiscal impact review from JFO and the Department of Taxes before proceeding.