Supervisors discuss expanding senior exemptions and new 100% veteran exemption under state chapter amendment

Columbia County Board/Committee Meeting · January 28, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Real property staff briefed the committee on possible local adoption to raise senior/disabled property tax exemptions and on an incoming state chapter amendment that would make a 100% veteran exemption mandatory for narrowly defined qualifying veterans.

Real property staff briefed supervisors on two related tax-exemption issues: a local option to increase the senior/disabled exemption from its current level (previously up to 50% at lowest income level) toward the state maximum (now expressed as a dollar figure at higher income thresholds), and a recently enacted state chapter amendment that will make a 100% exemption mandatory for certain veterans.

Staff said the state recently expanded the allowable senior/disabled exemption from 50% up to 65% at the lowest income tier, which requires local adoption to take effect. The county will need time to analyze budgetary impacts and to determine income thresholds and town-by-town feasibility; staff suggested a staged approach and asked assessors to run impact reports for different towns.

Separately, staff described a newly enacted veteran exemption that, when implemented by a chapter amendment expected to take effect in October, will make a 100% exemption mandatory for veterans who meet several strict criteria: a 100% permanent and total disability rating, qualifying for the VA’s Specially Adapted Housing grant, and conditions such as PTSD or TBI or other qualifying service-connected circumstances. Staff said most counties may have few or no eligible veterans and that the county would coordinate with Veterans Affairs to identify any eligible residents.

Supervisors asked for follow-up data showing potential fiscal impact and for coordination with assessors and Veterans Affairs. No formal county policy change was adopted at the meeting; staff was asked to return with analysis and numbers.