Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Derelict Vessels topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers weigh quicker removal of derelict vessels to reduce environmental and fiscal harm
Summary
House Bill 21‑99 would broaden the definition of derelict vessel and shorten enforcement timelines so ports, counties and DNR can intervene before boats sink; ports, counties and local officials testified in support citing recent costly sinkings and risks to Puget Sound.
House Bill 21‑99 would expand the statutory definition of derelict and abandoned vessels, allow prioritization of long‑out‑of‑compliance boats for removal, and change appeal and custody timing so authorities can act earlier to prevent sinking and large clean‑up costs.
Representative Addison Richards, the bill’s sponsor, cited a recent tug sinking in Bremerton that released thousands of gallons of oil and required months of response and federal assistance. "We spent millions of dollars," Richards said, arguing the current statutory timeline can let at‑risk vessels deteriorate to the point of sinking.
Local governments, ports, and boating associations strongly supported the bill. Oren Root, Kitsap County commission chair, said the revised custody and appeal timing would allow faster intervention and reduce risk to Puget Sound while preserving due process through posted notices and good‑faith owner‑contact requirements. "This process ... is followed by a 30‑day appeal period before the vessel is sold or destroyed," he said.
Port representatives and municipal officials said earlier intervention lowers downstream costs to taxpayers, reduces fuel and debris hazards, and protects nearshore habitats important to shellfish and salmon. The committee closed the public hearing and discussed the bill’s fiscal note and amendment language with staff; no vote was taken.
