Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Quantum Strategy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers hear industry support and regulatory questions for state quantum strategy bill
Summary
House Bill 2446 would direct Commerce to create a statewide quantum technology strategy, funded by non‑state partners where possible. Industry groups backed the planning approach; members raised concerns about fiscal notes and avoiding regulatory capture.
Get email alerts on the Quantum Strategy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Technology, Economic Development and Veterans Committee heard House Bill 2446, which would require the Department of Commerce to develop a state quantum strategy identifying opportunities for industry growth, partnerships, workforce needs and economic impact.
Committee staff said the strategy must be developed by June 30, may rely on non-state funding, and could be prepared by a contractor such as a quantum manufacturer or regional coalition. The staff summary noted possible contract authority and a focus on commercialization, workforce development and partnerships with universities and national laboratories.
Proponents emphasized opportunity and private investment. Amy Harrison of the Washington Technology Industry Association said HB 2,446 ‘‘takes a thoughtful forward-looking approach’’ that leverages private and federal investment without adding regulatory burdens. Laura Ruderman of the Technology Alliance said the strategy is critical to ‘‘catch up’’ and prepare for security risks associated with ‘Q Day,’ noting major private-sector concern about readiness. Lauren McDonald, testifying for Microsoft, supported the bill and asked a friendly amendment to change the definition to ‘‘quantum technology’’ to cover computing, sensing and communications.
Members pressed sponsors on funding and oversight. Representative Kloba asked whether the bill prevents regulatory capture if industry helps fund or draft the strategy; the prime sponsor and industry witnesses said regulatory frameworks can be included and that the bill aims to align public and private interests. Commerce staff was not present to provide a fiscal estimate; the sponsor said the expectation is to rely on private funders for planning to keep the fiscal note low.
What’s next. The committee closed the hearing; sponsors and industry representatives indicated willingness to work on amendments and to return fiscal details as available.
