Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ev Charging Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate committee hears bill to allow state agencies to charge private EV drivers for charging at state facilities

Senate Transportation Committee · January 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

SB 5,750 would explicitly authorize state agencies to charge fees to privately owned EVs at state office locations and require those fees be deposited into the motor vehicle fund; sponsor Jeff Wilson described the change as cost recovery for 'free fuel' used at state chargers.

The Senate Transportation Committee received testimony on Senate Bill 5,750, which would authorize state agencies to provide charging at state office locations for privately owned electric vehicles and require any such fees to be deposited into the motor vehicle fund.

Brandon Popovac, committee staff, said current law permits the state to purchase power to charge vehicles used for state business; SB 5,750 would explicitly allow agencies to provide paid charging to private vehicles present at state locations for business or other purposes. Popovac said a fiscal note had been requested and that revenues and costs would be indeterminate because the bill provides permissive authority rather than mandatory programmatic change.

Senator Jeff Wilson, the bill sponsor, argued the change would "level the playing field" because more than 400 state‑owned or leased chargers are effectively providing free electricity to private drivers. "Free fuel is not fair fuel," Wilson said, adding that collected fees would be deposited into the motor vehicle fund and would not affect the state fleet.

Senator McEwen asked whether administrative solutions with the executive branch had been explored rather than legislation; Wilson said agencies have discussed options but legislation provides a consistent rule across state facilities, and noted existing account‑based payment systems (ChargePoint, others) could segregate campus users from outside users.

The committee closed the public hearing after recording 82 pro and 3 con sign‑ins. No formal committee action was taken during the hearing.