Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hayden council denies Viking Construction appeal of extraordinary impact fee assessment
Summary
The City of Hayden denied Viking Construction's appeal of an extraordinary impact fee assessment after a hearing; council found no procedural remand and voted to uphold the city administrator's assessment. The decision directs Viking to pursue procedural remedies if desired.
Hayden, Idaho — The Hayden City Council voted unanimously Jan. 27 to deny Viking Construction’s appeal of an extraordinary impact fee assessment tied to the Battleground Subdivision.
Peter Smith, attorney for Viking Construction, told the council the appeal raised two legal points: that the subdivision does not uniquely cause the cited intersections to fall below the city’s required level of service and that staff failed to perform a required proportionality analysis. “The development being done by Viking Construction will not result in an extraordinary impact,” Smith said, arguing that ambient growth across the city — not the Battleground project alone — causes the projected service declines.
City legal counsel Fonda defended the administrator’s assessment and explained timing and funding constraints. Fonda said the subdivision was approved conditionally and that the peer review of the traffic impact analysis (TIA) and associated proportional-share work was contemplated prior to construction-plan submittal. The council asked staff detailed questions about the TIA assumptions, fund balances and the city’s capital-improvement priorities during the hearing.
Council Member Rotor moved to deny the appeal; Council Member Schafer seconded the motion. The roll-call vote was recorded in favor of denying the appeal (Council President DePries: yes; Council Member Erickson: yes; Council Member Schafer: yes; Council Member Rotor: yes).
The record reflects differing figures discussed during the hearing: Smith referenced a 171-home figure for the Battleground Subdivision; other participants referred to 176 in the application and a representative mentioned about 70 (the transcript records variant numbers). The council and staff also discussed funding availability: the TIA methodology identifies $291,000 of eligible impact fees for the Hayden-and-Hutter intersection and more than $1,000,000 for Hayden-and-Carrington; staff stated post-discounted funds available for these purposes are “somewhere under $200,000.”
The council’s vote preserves the city administrator’s extraordinary-impact assessment. Staff noted Viking retains procedural and legal options beyond the council decision, including additional administrative steps or appeals.
