Subcommittee Keeps Corporate‑ownership Review in Five‑Year Housing Assessment, Carries Bill Over

Civil Subcommittee of Courts of Justice · January 31, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Delegate Shin's substitute would require the five‑year statewide housing needs assessment to include a review of parcels owned by partnerships, corporations or investment trusts meeting specified thresholds; members removed an enactment clause to secure stakeholder neutrality and carried the bill over to the next session.

The subcommittee adopted a subcommittee substitute from Delegate Shin that would add language to the Commonwealth’s five‑year housing needs assessment requiring review of parcels owned by certain corporate entities.

Under the substitute, DHCD would review parcels owned by partnerships, corporations or real‑estate investment trusts that manage funds for investors, have net assets under management on any taxable day and that hold interests in more than 50 single‑family homes or more than 10% of manufactured‑home parks as defined in §55.1‑1300. Delegate Shin cited Lincoln Institute data showing higher corporate ownership rates in many Virginia localities and said the change aims to surface supply and equity issues tied to corporate ownership.

The committee debated a friendly amendment offered by Delegate Maldonado to retain the language adding the corporate‑ownership review while striking the broader enactment/study language; counsel and the sponsor said removing the enactment clause helped secure stakeholder neutrality from bankers and realtors. The amendment was adopted and a subsequent substitute motion to carry the bill over until the next session carried, giving sponsors time to refine language.

Anne Grama Tatus and other advocates testified in support, urging broader protections and noting delayed disclosure patterns. The chair said the carriage preserves options and gives stakeholders time to reach consensus before full committee consideration.

The subcommittee’s action keeps the reporting requirement in the housing needs assessment but postpones final action to a later session for further drafting and stakeholder engagement.