Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council directs staff to clarify LDC exemption language after dispute over $2,500 development-order fee
Summary
A developer’s request to place a permanent canopy over a paved lot prompted debate about whether the work requires a $2,500 minor development-order fee. Council directed staff to review Section 2.0502 and related LDC language and return with clarifying amendments and guidance.
A proposed permanent canopy over an existing paved area triggered a debate about the land-development code’s (LDC) development-order and exemption provisions and whether the canopy should have been treated as a minor development order requiring a $2,500 fee.
The applicant and council members argued the canopy does not increase impervious area or change use or intensity and should be treated as a permit-level item without a $2,500 minor development-order fee. Staff responded that because there was an existing development order for the site, the canopy was being handled as a deviation to a final development plan and thus fell under the minor/major deviation rules as currently interpreted.
Council heard that section 2.0502 of the LDC contains an exemption process for very minor alterations but that interpretations vary when a prior development order exists. Members asked staff to prioritize the LDC rewrite to clarify exemptions, to produce guidance about when a DO exemption applies (including the role of prior development orders), and to consider rescuing small, low-impact projects from a costly minor development-order process.
Council directed staff to review the code language, confirm interpretation and the availability of the DO-exemption process, and return with recommended text amendments and administrative guidance.
