Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Code officer documents up to 45 chickens but takes no enforcement after neighbors decline to testify
Summary
Code enforcement documented a long investigation into roaming chickens and roosters linked to 6401 Lake Clark Drive and estimated 35–45 fowl at peak, but the board did not issue an enforcement order because neighbors declined to be formal complainants and staff lacked direct proof of housing/feeding on the town side.
At the Jan. 28, 2026 hearing, the town’s code enforcement officer described a prolonged investigation into chickens and roosters associated with 6401 Lake Clark Drive (Case 25‑819). Officer testimony and the town police chief indicated earlier contact with the resident; the officer said the resident partially admitted to ownership and feeding.
The officer reported that, during the investigation, staff and police observed chickens roaming across multiple properties and estimated "anywhere from 35 to 45 chickens and and roosters" at one point. Neighbors who witnessed the birds declined to be listed as complainants or testify. The officer explained the legal standard under town code section 6‑5: to proceed with enforcement the town must be able to show livestock or fowl are being housed and regularly fed on the respondent’s property. Because staff could not obtain sworn complainants or property access—and because some birds were observed on adjacent Palm Beach County parcels—the board recorded the investigation details on the public record but took no enforcement action at the meeting.
The officer warned the board that the flock could increase and recommended that future complaints be documented so staff can pursue enforcement if housing/feeding can be shown. The board discussed options and limits of animal control and county services; staff said county animal control typically responds only to sick or injured animals and not routine collection.
What happens next: the matter remains documented; the town will accept future complaints and may reopen enforcement if evidence of housing/feeding on the town side is obtained.
