Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Horry County council unanimously approves a package of rezones and development agreements

Horry County Council · July 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the July 15 meeting, council conducted second readings and public hearings for multiple ordinances (Nos. 61–72, 2025), including rezones from forest/agriculture to residential and approvals for development agreements; each item drew no public speakers and passed by unanimous voice vote.

Horry County Council on July 15 held second readings and public hearings on a set of zoning and development items and approved them unanimously by voice vote.

The items recorded in the meeting transcript include:

- Ordinances 61 and 62 (rezoning PIN 40506020005 from forest/agriculture to residential and corresponding Future Land Use Map amendments) — no public comment; approved by voice vote. - Ordinance 63 (agent Robert Guyton for Curtis Williamson) — no public comment; approved by voice vote. - Ordinance 66 (William Hughes and Barbara Sullivan, agents for Henry Wethersbee) — approved by voice vote. - Ordinance 67 (Home Builders Team LLC) — approved by voice vote. - Ordinance 68 (Josie Ben Ezra, agent for Pure Assets LLC) — approved by voice vote. - Ordinance 69 (2410 Monica Drive, LLC) — approved by voice vote. - Ordinance 70 (Mark Smith, agent for Smith Capital Holdings) — approved by voice vote. - Ordinances 71 and 72 (development agreement with Highway 9 Industrial Holdings LLC on a parcel on Hwy 701, and rezoning PIN 2100000004 to general manufacturing/industrial and heavy industrial) — both approved by voice vote.

The transcript shows the chair opened each item to the public; no speakers came forward and council members moved and seconded the motions, with "all in favor, aye" recorded for each vote. The record does not include roll‑call tallies, conditions of approvals, or detailed staff reports for each case. Several items list agents and applicants by name in the record; the transcript does not include staff memos or adopted conditions that may accompany county ordinance approvals.

Next steps: Adopted ordinances and development agreements will be reflected in the county's official zoning map and files; the meeting transcript does not detail implementation steps or infrastructure conditions.