Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Public Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Meadow board debates approving off-agenda monthly bills, cites Open Public Meeting Act risks
Summary
Board members discussed approving recurring monthly payments not explicitly listed on the agenda (vendors mentioned: Enbridge, Frontier), reviewed a $5,000 contracting threshold and legal remedies under the Open Public Meeting Act, and scheduled a budget workshop for April 21.
Unidentified Speaker 1 asked whether a recurring vendor payment for Enbridge and Frontier was covered by the meeting agenda. Unidentified Speaker 2 responded that the board routinely approves line-item bill payments and that, if the expense is part of an approved budget line, approving the payment now carries only "a little bit of risk." Speaker 2 noted that a challenger has 90 days to raise the issue with the county attorney and that the county attorney could later rule it was not sufficiently specific on the agenda.
The board discussed contracting thresholds. Speaker 2 said the $5,000 threshold triggers contracting rules (multiple bids) and described those matters as a contracting issue distinct from open-meeting procedure: "So as long as we have multiple bids and we've approved that line item, I think we're okay." Speaker 1 recalled a past instance when a large water bill arrived after a meeting and required follow-up; Speaker 2 said staff should revisit similar bills next month with answers for the board.
Speaker 2 explained legal procedures under the Open Public Meeting Act: an aggrieved person may sue to compel compliance or determine applicability, courts review recordings or minutes, and if a court finds a violation it must publicly disclose the illegally closed portion. Speaker 2 warned there is a criminal penalty for knowingly violating meeting-closing provisions—a class B misdemeanor.
The board agreed to schedule a budget work meeting in April to prepare for the fiscal-year change. Speaker 2 asked staff to provide the familiar percentage sheets in paper form ahead of time; the board set a work meeting for 6:00 p.m. with the regular town meeting at 7:00 p.m. on April 21.
The discussion combined procedural caution (transparency and legal exposure) with practical budgeting needs: members emphasized the difference between a previously approved budget line and a new contracting decision that would require bid procedures.
