Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Participation Agreement Noncompliance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
RDA member asks staff to place 30‑day noncompliance notice for Don Worthington on next agenda
Summary
At an RDA meeting, an unidentified participant said Don Worthington’s due diligence under a participation agreement ‘‘has not been completed’’ and asked staff to place a 30‑day notice to end the agreement on next week’s agenda; the meeting adjourned after the request.
An attendee at an RDA meeting asked staff to put on next week’s agenda a letter notifying Don Worthington that his participation agreement is out of compliance and to begin the required 30‑day notice to terminate the agreement’s liability provisions.
“His due diligence has not been completed,” said Unidentified Speaker 2, adding that the due diligence “has not been completed or is out of compliance with the participation agreement, and I'd like to get on the agenda for next week, a letter noticing that individual, the the required 30 day notice to end the participation agreement for liability terms.” Unidentified Speaker 1 acknowledged the request.
The comment came after the board returned to open session by motion and a short recorded affirmation of support. Speaker 2 asked that Kent be notified to prepare a letter “from this week,” and Speaker 1 confirmed staff would be notified. There was no formal motion recorded in the transcript to finalize the notice; participants agreed to place the item on the next agenda and to inform staff.
Earlier in the closing minutes, Speaker 1 asked for a motion to return to open session; Speaker 2 said, “So moved,” and the meeting recorded affirmative responses naming Jack White, Matt Tippets and Brandon DeRionne. Speaker 1 then said, “I believe we've completed everything on the agenda,” and later adjourned the meeting by acclamation at 03:16.
The request to place a 30‑day noncompliance notice on the agenda signals a forthcoming formal item; the transcript does not record any evidence supporting or rebutting the claim about Worthington’s due diligence, nor does it record a formal vote to terminate the agreement. The matter is expected to appear as an agenda item at the next RDA meeting for further action.
