Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Daggett County Municipal Building Authority approves routine financial items; invoice amount shows small discrepancy

Daggett County Municipal Building Authority · July 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The authority approved prior minutes, acknowledged the cash and accounts receivable reports, and approved an open invoice register and a disbursement summary. The transcript shows the mover cited $111,972.62 for the invoice register while the readback stated $111,979.62.

The Daggett County Municipal Building Authority voted on routine financial business at its July 29 meeting, approving prior minutes, acknowledging the cash summary and accounts receivable report, and approving an open invoice register and a weekly disbursement summary.

Speaker 2 moved to approve the prior meeting minutes (the motion text in the transcript included several date references and verbal confusion). The motion was seconded, and Speaker 1 confirmed the minutes from Tuesday, July 29, 2025 were approved by voice vote.

Speaker 2 moved to acknowledge receipt of the cash summary as of July 25, 2025 and the accounts receivable report; Speaker 3 seconded and the authority approved the acknowledgement by voice vote.

Speaker 2 also moved to approve the Municipal Building Authority open invoice register. In the initial motion Speaker 2 stated the amount as "$111,972.62," but when Speaker 1 read the register aloud the amount was given as "$111,979.62." Despite the discrepancy in the spoken amounts, the board approved the open invoice register by voice vote.

Finally, Speaker 2 moved to approve the MBA disbursement summary for July 17–24, 2025 in the amount of $33,983.20; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote with no voids noted.

Votes were taken by voice; the transcript records the board responding “Aye” but does not provide a roll‑call tally by name. The transcript does not identify which member made or seconded each motion by a proper name; speakers are recorded by their speaker number. The minutes, register and disbursement summaries approved at the meeting did not have itemized line details or supporting documents included in the transcript.