Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council to study policing and traffic-enforcement options after residents raise speeding and noise concerns
Summary
The council reviewed a proposed policing contract (roughly $35,000/year) to provide daily patrol and community-engagement coverage and debated alternatives—automated speed displays, dummy police cars, photo enforcement, speed dips and deputization—before agreeing to research options and publicize proposals for further discussion.
Residents and council members raised repeated complaints about speeding, ATVs, and e-bikes on Canyon Road and Southfield Road during public comment. Mayor (unnamed) reported that a regional police agency had proposed a policing contract that would provide a local officer on-call and a minimum scheduled hour per day for proactive patrols at an estimated cost of about $35,000 annually (broken down to roughly $10.61/month per household if apportioned across town households).
Councilors and residents debated the merits and costs of a contract officer versus lower-cost alternatives: automated speed-display signs (already installed in some locations), a staged enforcement schedule, dummy/presence-marked vehicles, photo/citation enforcement, local deputization of community members and physical traffic-calming measures (speed dips). Some council members cautioned that a one-hour daily presence would be insufficient unless staggered and emphasized the complexity of ticket processing and court jurisdiction. Others expressed concern about the cost burden to every household.
The council did not adopt the contract at the meeting; instead members asked staff to analyze options (costs, jurisdictional/justice-court implications, and enforcement logistics), to publicize the proposal in a newsletter so residents can provide feedback, and to bring a more detailed plan back to a future meeting.
