Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Swap topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council voices confusion over BLM land-swap terms and state flood-mitigation funding
Summary
Council members reported conflicting information about a potential BLM land swap related to a flood-mitigation project; some county and state officials told the town it would require fair-market payment, while others indicated a state-funded critical-use option could make land available at $1 per acre. Council members asked staff to follow up with BLM contact Reg Johnson.
Unidentified Speaker 4 briefed the council on outreach about a BLM land-swap proposal tied to flood-mitigation work and said the town had received mixed messages about cost and process. He told the council that state representatives and emergency officials told him there is a program that allows the BLM to make land available for critical municipal uses at a nominal rate, while other officials conveyed that fair-market value would be required.
Unidentified Speaker 1 described calls with BLM and state offices and said they were receiving conflicting guidance. "I have it in writing from BLM too," Unidentified Speaker 1 said, and referenced the risk of protracted paperwork and possible cost. At one point the council referenced a recently passed state bill with emergency funds; Unidentified Speaker 4 told the council the bill "got signed by the governor, and it's got, 150,000,000."
Members said they are split on moving forward: several said the town cannot afford fair-market acquisitions but would consider the land if it were available at nominal cost or if outside funding covered remediation and mitigation. Unidentified Speaker 4 provided Reg Johnson's phone number and staff agreed to follow up with the BLM and state emergency offices to clarify timelines, cost obligations and any conditions attached to a land transfer.
Next steps: staff or a designated council member will contact BLM and state representatives to clarify whether the town can obtain the property at nominal cost and whether state mitigation funds would be contingent on the land swap.
