Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rda Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Daggett County RDA reviews 2025 amendments, outlines proposed 2026 budget
Summary
The Daggett County Redevelopment Agency reviewed proposed 2025 budget amendments, agreed to include charges for infrastructure relocation in the '25 budget, and discussed a $75,000 administrative-cost estimate for 2026 tied to a percentage of projected land-sale revenue; no public comments were offered and the hearing was adjourned.
The Daggett County Redevelopment Agency held a public hearing to review amendments to its 2025 budget and to consider the draft 2026 RDA budget. Speaker 1 opened the hearing and asked staff to present the proposed 2025 amendments and the draft 2026 budget.
During the discussion of 2025 amendments, Speaker 1 said the RDA had “made a commitment, to pay 59,000, just under 60,000, of additional money towards relocating some infrastructure.” Speaker 3 and Speaker 2 clarified that the relocation work was performed in 2025 and that, for accounting and billing purposes, those costs should be included in the 2025 budget. Speaker 2 also stated, “I just need to add 69,000 to that,” reflecting a discrepancy in the amounts as spoken in the record.
On the 2026 proposal, Speaker 3 identified an RDA administrative-cost line of $75,000 and asked how the figure had been derived. Speaker 2 said the RDA changed last year to calculating administrative costs as a percent of revenue rather than setting a fixed amount, and that the $75,000 number is an estimate under that approach. Speaker 2 noted that the percentage used equates to roughly 10% of projected property-sale revenue, saying, “And that's just so that's 10% of the property sales,” and speakers discussed that this is an estimate of future sales rather than a precise staff-time accounting.
Speakers also reviewed committed participation agreements tied to infrastructure projects. Speaker 3 asked about a $112,500 entry described as red-storage infrastructure, and Speaker 1 identified the grouped entries as part of an agreement tied to GRL Holding and Jesse Lasley. Speaker 1 recited several committed amounts from the fund balance and said, “733,238 is what's outstanding and has been committed from the fund balance to infrastructure on those projects,” though portions of the spoken figures were unclear on the audio record.
When asked whether increases in the fund balance were from interest or land sales, Speaker 2 said the increase is from land sales and noted interest is also shown in the draft. Speaker 1 solicited public comment for both the 2025 amendments and the 2026 proposed budget; no members of the public spoke. With nothing further to discuss, Speaker 1 adjourned the public hearing at 12:13.
The hearing produced no formal motions or recorded votes in the transcript. Staff and board members agreed to include the relocation costs in the 2025 budget and to retain the administrative-cost estimate in the 2026 draft pending further clarification of revenue projections.
Clarifying details from the record: some numeric amounts were spoken quickly and are recorded verbatim from the audio; certain sums (notably a sequence of committed amounts recited by Speaker 1) were partially unclear in the transcript and are noted in the agency record as needing confirmation.
