Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pilt Rmp Blm topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee asks about PILT, BLM RMP and whether Grand Staircase ROD is final; officials report uncertainty
Summary
Members asked whether Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) are affected; officials said PILT is formula-based and funded though fluctuating. Questions about the BLM resource-management plan (RMP) and Record of Decision (ROD) for the Grand Staircase area remained unresolved in the meeting.
Committee members raised questions about Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) and the status of the BLM resource-management plan (RMP) and related RFP/Record of Decision (ROD) for local public lands planning.
When asked whether PILT had the same sunset risk as SRS, a committee member said PILT is "formula-based" and "it's funded," but that the formula can lag and requires periodic negotiation. One participant offered a ballpark figure for county PILT receipts, and another responded that the county receives approximately $170,000 for certain payments (described in the meeting as mineral-leases and payment-in-lieu components). The transcript records some numeric confusion among speakers; officials described PILT as funded but fluctuating.
On the county resource-management plan and the BLM RFP, members asked whether the RFP for the BLM's Grand Staircase planning process had been finalized and whether a Record of Decision was in place. Responses varied: some participants said an ROD had been issued and the new RMP was being implemented; others said they did not recall a published ROD and thought it might not exist. No county-confirmed ROD or final implementation status was established during this meeting.
The committee did not take formal action on the RMP or PILT. Committee members said they would follow up with agency partners and in interagency meetings for definitive ROD and RFP status.
