Students press Central Unified board to change valedictorian policy that penalizes rigorous coursework

A large group of Central Unified high school students told the board on Jan. 27 that the district’s valedictorian eligibility policy — which disqualifies students who receive a C in an augmented course — unfairly penalizes students who take AP and other rigorous classes.

Multiple speakers described narrow margins and borderline grades that they said should not erase years of achievement. “How does this policy reward students who take on honors and AP courses compared to those who choose not to challenge themselves?” asked Jasmine, a senior and valedictorian hopeful. Several seniors said a single augmented C had removed valedictorian eligibility for peers who otherwise maintained a 4.0‑plus GPA.

Community advocates and students framed the issue as one of equity and academic encouragement. Diljal Singh Rai, who had previously requested an investigation, thanked assistant superintendent McLennan and Superintendent Dr. Marshall for conducting a review that led to renewed consideration of affected students’ status. Rai said the inquiry resulted in 17 students being reconsidered for valedictorian status.

Superintendent Dr. Marshall said the district will schedule a town hall to gather student input and public comment, and he urged students to participate. “That’s in progress,” he told the board, adding that administration intends an inclusive process so the board and community can hear different viewpoints.

What happens next: The superintendent said a town hall will be scheduled so students, families and staff can present differing views and participate in the review process. Several trustees asked administration to bring a report back to the board with timelines for a decision before graduation, if feasible.

Why it matters: The policy affects senior recognition and can shape students’ course‑taking decisions. Students argued that the current rule discourages academic risk‑taking by punishing those who enroll in more rigorous coursework.

Select quotes come directly from student public comment and district responses recorded at the Jan. 27 board meeting.