Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Engineering Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends city adopt engineering standards to comply with new state law
Summary
The Emigration Canyon Planning Commission unanimously recommended that City Council adopt a package of engineering standard drawings and specifications (APWA, AASHTO, Utah MUTCD) required by House Bill 368, with limited local exceptions for small road excavations and a two-year municipal-project exception to mill-and-overlay rules.
Get email alerts on the Engineering Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Emigration Canyon — The Emigration Canyon Planning Commission on Thursday voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council adopt a consolidated set of engineering standard drawings and specifications designed to satisfy a state requirement that took effect this week.
Cameron, an engineering staff member with the Municipal Services District (MSD), told commissioners that House Bill 368 took effect the day before and requires municipalities to formally adopt construction and roadway standards. Cameron said staff’s draft would adopt by reference APWA standard plans, AASHTO geometric design guidance and the Utah Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices — but include limited local clarifications. "This means that I don't have to come back and go through this process every time there's an update," Cameron said of the proposed cross-reference to the city code.
Why it matters: the adoption would create a single, recorded reference for how Emigration Canyon requires rights-of-way and excavation repairs to be built and repaired. That clarity affects utilities and private contractors working on roads and helps the city enforce consistent compaction, trench repair and resurfacing practices.
What staff recommended: Cameron said the draft references the national and state manuals but reiterates Emigration Canyon code (Title 14 and cited code section 141610(c)) where the local rules are more stringent. The package keeps acity-level requirement that some recently paved roads be milled to the centerline or 15 feet each side for the first three years after paving, while proposing narrower mill-and-overlay footprints for small excavations and allowing an exemption if a municipal resurfacing project is planned within two years.
Key points from the discussion: commissioners pressed staff for practical limits (for example, how a 4‑ or 5‑inch utility trench would be handled). Commissioners and staff clarified three thresholds: for roads under three years old, the mill-and-overlay extends to the centerline or 15 feet; for roads older than three years, full-width milling would be required only for trenches longer than 300 feet; and no mill-and-overlay would be required for roads older than seven years. Commissioners also raised recurring quality concerns about compaction on previous repairs and asked whether county crews should perform some paving work rather than private contractors; staff said MSD coordinates with Salt Lake County Public Works and plans a micropave operation in July.
Outcome and next steps: Commissioner Jim Carcotte moved to recommend the standards; Commissioner Jody Giroux seconded. Chair Tim Harps called the vote and announced the motion passed unanimously. Cameron said that, if the commission’s recommendation is forwarded, staff will present the ordinance for formal adoption to City Council later in the month.
What the recommendation does not do: the commission’s action is a recommendation to City Council. It does not change code language itself; the adopted standards would be the technical details used to implement existing ordinance distances and thresholds. Staff said fees and the administrative question of whether the contractor or the city performs large repairs remain Council-level policy questions.
