Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Employee Compensation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission weighs 3% cost-of-living increase, one-time bonus and multiple personnel requests

Emery County Commission · October 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County officials discussed a 3% ongoing cost-of-living increase plus a possible one-time bonus, and reviewed multiple department personnel requests including the road shop, justice court, sheriff's office, aquatic center and merit increases for specific employees.

Commissioners discussed employee compensation and a string of personnel requests across departments as part of the budget review.

Speaker 5 recommended a 3% cost-of-living adjustment for all existing employees and proposed an additional one-time bonus to help offset inflation. "I'd rather see giving a 3% COLA to all of our existing employees than hiring new," Speaker 5 said, arguing the measure helps retention and morale.

Commissioners weighed private-sector impacts and eligibility rules; the commission review noted the county's prior practice of tying a one-time payment to a six-month tenure rule to avoid immediate payouts to recently hired staff. Commissioners discussed that an ongoing 3% COLA has long-term costs while a one-time payment is easier on the budget in a single year.

Separately, department heads asked for additional positions or reclassifications: the road department seeks snow-removal on-call pay and potential additional full-time staff; the aquatic center requested an additional full-time or 29-hour position to reduce reliance on student workers; the sheriff's office has several grant-funded positions and corrections staffing changes under consideration; and merit/grade increases were proposed for specific employees, including cleaning and administrative staff.

Commissioners emphasized balancing the fiscal impact of new full-time positions against operating needs, noting that adding full-time roles has substantial ongoing cost implications (benefits, retirement, overtime implications). No final decisions were made; the commission directed staff to return with cost estimates and implications for the final budget.