Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council edits animal-control wording as shelter contracts change; meat of holding and rabies-proof rules remain unresolved
Summary
Council reviewed animal-control ordinance updates to remove references to a specific shelter, simplify rabies-proof language (moving away from requiring a veterinarian signature), and discussed short-term holding arrangements. Members agreed the wording should be generic until a contracted facility is secured and asked the attorney for guidance on livestock and liability.
Councilors reviewed proposed edits to the city’s animal-control ordinance focused on dog licensing, proof of rabies vaccination and how impounded animals will be handled now that a prior arrangement with an outside shelter is no longer in effect.
A council member said the ordinance currently names a shelter that the city no longer uses and recommended removing that specific reference. Participants agreed the ordinance language should be generic so the city can point to "a contracted facility" rather than naming a shelter that may change.
On rabies proof, members recommended removing a requirement that documentation include the veterinarian’s signature and instead require "proof in writing," such as the certificate typically provided by clinics. One member noted that some clinics do not provide a signed form, so removing the signature requirement would prevent an administrative barrier to licensing.
The council also debated how long impounded animals should be held and what happens after the local holding period (three days) ends. Members raised the practical problem that surrounding county or regional shelters are overwhelmed; one councilor said 'Brigham's overwhelmed' and another said local options are limited. The mayor offered his property as a potential temporary holding location for livestock but flagged liability and contract questions; the council asked the city attorney to advise on contract language and legal risk before formalizing any arrangement.
Councilors agreed to keep ordinance language deliberately generic (e.g., 'impounded animals will be adequately housed and fed for three days then sent to a contracted facility') to avoid repeated ordinance amendments as contracts change. Staff will prepare an updated ordinance draft reflecting the wording changes and return it for the next meeting and for public hearing notice.
