Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners clarify proposed fencing ordinance addresses livestock, not lighting or noise
Summary
A county commissioner raised a proposed amendment to clarify that the county's 'fence out' provisions apply to livestock/domestic animals rather than lighting or noise; participants discussed past code changes and where 'fence in' might be appropriate.
A proposed ordinance change prompted a focused discussion clarifying intent and scope: commissioners said the text concerns livestock and domestic animals (fence out vs. fence in) and is not intended to address lighting or noise.
Speakers who raise livestock concerns noted state fence-out rules and recalled that the county changed its approach about a decade ago. Several attendees said fencing decisions can be context-specific and that some locations may warrant a 'fence in' approach; others stressed that property owners remain responsible when animals stray.
No vote was recorded on the ordinance during this meeting. The commission requested that cities review the proposed language and be prepared to discuss specific local situations at a future meeting.
