Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Huntington MBA approves 2025 budget adjustment and adopts FY2026 budget

Huntington Municipal Building Authority · June 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Huntington Municipal Building Authority held a public hearing June 18, 2025, approved Resolution 7-2025 to increase the 2025 budget from $41,830 to $46,230 and adopted Resolution 8-2025 setting the MBA fiscal year budget at $86,820 after unanimous aye votes from members present.

Mary Norton, presiding officer of the Huntington Municipal Building Authority, opened a public hearing June 18 and the board approved two budget measures: a 2025 adjustment and adoption of the fiscal-year budget for the MBA.

During the hearing an unidentified presenter said the proposed adjustment would increase municipal building authority revenue and expenses from $41,830 to $46,230 and that fiscal year 2026 revenue and expenses were being set at $43,410. After public comment and closing the hearing, the board took formal action on two resolutions.

Resolution 7-2025, to adjust the MBA 2025 budget by increasing revenue and expenses from $41,830 to $46,230, was moved by Judd and seconded by Tom Kaye. The board recorded affirmative votes from Gloria Wilson, Judd, Devin Wilson, Lisa Miller and Tom Kaye and the motion passed.

Resolution 8-2025, to set the MBA fiscal year budget at $86,820, was moved by Tom Kaye and seconded by Devin Wilson. The same members recorded aye votes and the motion passed.

The meeting also included routine business: the board approved minutes from its June 18, 2024 meeting (motion by Gloria Wilson; second by Lisa Miller) and, with no further business, adjourned after a motion by Gloria Wilson and a second by Lisa Miller.

No statutes, grants, contracts or external funding sources were referenced during the hearing and no votes to amend either resolution were recorded. The hearing record shows an on-site participant identified by the chair as an employee rather than a member of the public; no substantive objections or votes against the resolutions were recorded.