Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Two Family Setbacks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board discusses easing two-family site-plan rules and possible URB side-yard reduction
Summary
Planning staff proposed exempting most two-family projects from site-plan review to lower cost and time barriers, and floated reducing URB side-yard setbacks (15 ft to 12 ft or 10 ft); board members asked for maps, renderings and neighborhood consultation before any referral to city council.
The Northampton City Planning Board began a policy discussion on Jan. 22, 2026 about proposed zoning text changes intended to streamline small-scale housing and alter side-yard setbacks in the urban residential b (URB) district.
Planning staff (Carolyn) presented draft language that would exempt two-family homes from site-plan review across most zones so long as projects remain below a special-permit threshold; she said the special-permit threshold for larger two-family projects would remain at 1,800 square feet per unit. "So that's what this would do," Carolyn said, explaining the aim was to "eliminate that barrier to and reduce costs and time and all of that for people who are building a second unit." The draft would also continue to allow up to four "half-scale" units (defined in the zoning code as 800 square feet or less) in some districts as an incentive for smaller units.
Board members asked detailed questions about how half-scale units interact with parking and existing district allowances. Carolyn and others emphasized that unit-count changes would not remove the basic requirement that each unit must provide one parking space; they noted site-plan review is the procedural trigger being altered, not development standards such as parking.
Members also debated a separate proposal to reduce side-yard setbacks in the URB district from 15 feet toward 12 feet (and discussed 10 feet as a possible alternative) to give builders more workable building envelopes on 50-foot lots. One board member cautioned that "this would completely change the character of all of the neighborhoods," and other members urged accompanying safeguards, such as requiring a portion of open space to be contiguous so parcels do not meet open-space minimums through many thin slivers. Several members said they wanted maps, visual examples and outreach to city councilors representing affected neighborhoods before forwarding any zoning text to the City Council.
No formal vote on the zoning language or setbacks was taken; Carolyn will prepare maps and renderings and continue outreach to councilors and stakeholders for further discussion at a future meeting.
