Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Training Reimbursement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discusses training payback, favors prorated two‑year commitment and tables form until next week
Summary
County commissioners debated whether to require trainees to repay training costs, discussed prorating payback and a two-year service requirement, agreed to adapt the EMT form for CDL training, and tabled the item to allow staff to produce a clearer agreement.
Commission members discussed whether employees who receive county-sponsored training should be required to repay the county if they leave. Unidentified Speaker 1 raised the topic and said paying for schooling can be a hardship for employees who pursue training without a sponsor. Participants discussed prorating repayment so that "the longer they work, the less they have to pay," as Unidentified Speaker 3 put it, and several commissioners favored a two-year service timeframe before the county would require repayment.
Speakers noted an existing EMT reimbursement form might be a suitable template to adapt for CDL training. Unidentified Speaker 4 offered to reword the draft and email it to staff; Unidentified Speaker 2 said they preferred to "get it right" and recommended tabling the item for one week to allow staff time to prepare an updated document. The commission agreed to table item 4 to allow staff to draft a clearer agreement and return with an updated form at the next meeting.
No formal repayment schedule or enforcement mechanism was adopted at the meeting; the discussion produced direction for staff to prepare a revised form and consider prorating and a two-year service requirement.
