Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Rollovers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Budget Committee approves prior minutes and reviews large budget opening with multiple rollovers
Summary
Davis County Budget Committee approved Dec. 9 and Jan. 13 minutes and reviewed a sizable budget opening ahead of a March 11 board action, covering numerous rollovers and reclassifications across capital projects, sheriff programs and animal care. No final vote on the opening was taken; the committee was briefed for action tomorrow.
Davis County’s Budget Committee met March 10 and approved minutes from Dec. 9 and Jan. 13 by voice vote. Members then reviewed a large budget opening the county plans to present to the full board on March 11, focused mainly on rollovers of prior capital projects and fund reclassifications.
Controller’s office staff walked the committee through multiple rollover and amendment requests. Items carried forward from 2024 include finishing an Armintech contract for elections (about $21,129), facility and equipment rollovers for Western Sports Park and the Davis Conference Center, and a large air‑handler and boiler project on the Justice Complex that showed an approximately $7 million expense change largely composed of rollover costs. Staff emphasized most changes are funded by ending fund balances in restricted funds rather than the general fund.
The sheriff’s office requested reclassifications and offsets for programs such as ankle‑monitoring, SCRAM and inmate services; those moves were described as budget neutral and part of an estimated $167,000 in composed items. The shooting range staffing request was presented as a prorated nine‑month part‑time payroll estimate, with recruitment reported as posted.
Animal‑care requests included moving about $44,000 from operating supplies into capital equipment (washer/dryers, oxygen) and a rollover for design services. Public Works and infrastructure projects (box culverts, dump trucks and copier reclassifications) were also carried forward where construction remains in progress.
Committee members pressed on project delivery and accountability for recurring tourism‑related rollovers at the conference center, questioning why repeated funding has not translated into completed work. Staff acknowledged private‑partner complexities can slow delivery and said they will follow up with more details.
The controller asked members to await final distribution at month end to set the definitive fund‑balance position before many decisions are finalized. No further formal actions were taken on the budget opening during the meeting; staff indicated a resolution related to the budget opening will go before the board the next day.
