Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nondepartmental Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Controller outlines debt responsibilities, memberships and small budget trims in non‑departmental budget
Summary
The controller reviewed nondepartmental lines including bond payments (library levy swaps, tourism tax for Western Sports Park), membership dues, postage, and small cuts such as delaying an actuarial contract and eliminating a folding-machine maintenance contract.
Davis County’s controller walked the Budget Committee through several nondepartmental items that affect the county’s general fund and highlighted steps to trim smaller recurring expenses.
On debt service, Speaker 1 listed multiple bond obligations and how they are funded: a refunding bond for flood control (~$1,000,008), a 2019B tranche (~$400,000) where sales-tax pledges are being satisfied via the library property tax levy, courthouse 2020 bonds paid from the general fund, and a roughly $70 million obligation tied to the Western Sports Park that is serviced with local tourism tax receipts. Speaker 1 warned that if a pledged revenue source falls short the general fund is expected to cover debt service.
Speaker 1 reviewed recurring memberships and dues, noting Wasatch Front Regional Council at about $87,000 a year, Utah Association of Counties (UAC) about $82,000 a year, NACO ~$6,000 and a Sam's Club membership (~$300). Speaker 1 said some memberships provide legislative influence and peer support; participants asked about dues formulas and why dues rose when one large county briefly left an association.
Staff also outlined line‑item and efficiency cuts in the controller’s budget: postponing an actuarial contract expense (~$17,500) to a later year, cutting roughly $7,700 from travel and training, reassigning a $3,000 fraud‑hotline to an internal IT implementation (with the option to link to the state auditor’s hotline), and eliminating an annual $23 maintenance contract on an $8,000 folding machine.
Speaker 1 cautioned about rising external professional service costs: earlier rebids in Weber County produced 35–40% increases and some forthcoming bids could approach 150% of last year’s budgets for particular services, meaning the county may face sharp contract-cost increases.
No formal decisions were made; Speaker 1 said these proposed adjustments were intended to be incremental savings in a tight fiscal year and would be refined as staff continue work.
