Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campaign Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate considers tighter campaign-finance reporting for ballot-question committees
Summary
Senators debated S.2898 to require monthly reporting and greater transparency for state ballot-question committees, closing an eight-month reporting gap and requiring inclusion of pre-qualification spending and in-kind contributions.
The Massachusetts Senate heard floor remarks on Senate Bill 2898, a proposal to strengthen transparency and reporting rules for ballot-question committees. The bill would require monthly reporting to the Office of Campaign and Political Finance (OCPF), close an eight-month 'dark' reporting period, require reporting of in-kind contributions, and direct OCPF to include pre-qualification spending (polling, research, legal and consulting) in reports.
Supporters described the bill as bipartisan and necessary because existing law allows a long period when funds raised for ballot questions are not publicly reported. One senator said in the last decade more than $340 million has been spent on ballot questions in Massachusetts and that a large share of that money was raised during the period with no timely public reports. The sponsor proposed two floor amendments: one to make reporting retroactive so past months would be reported, and another to require OCPF regulations to include pre-qualification expenditures in reporting.
The sponsor asked that the vote be taken by roll call; debate continued and caucus scheduling was announced for later in the day. The transcript ends with the senator moving under Rule 13(b) for a Republican caucus until 5:50 p.m.
