Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Roads And Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pleasant Plain Road dispute: employer urges pause on chip seal as county cites funding limits
Summary
A local employer urged Jefferson County supervisors to pause recent chip-seal work on Pleasant Plain Road, calling it an inferior fix; county engineers said chip sealing is the most feasible preventive-maintenance option under current STP and farm-to-market funding and outlined short-term mitigation steps.
Jeff, who identified himself as representing a large local employer, pressed the Jefferson County Board of Supervisors to stop and reassess recent chip-seal work on Pleasant Plain Road, saying the treatment left the route in poor condition and risks harming recruitment and business.
"Continuing on chip seal, I don't think is the right path," Jeff said, noting nearby roads that had not been chip sealed and asking whether alternatives — including a higher-cost overlay — had been fully considered.
County engineering staff responded that, given the county's available funding streams, chip seal was the selected preventive-maintenance strategy. The engineer said the treatment "provides additional binder to help rejuvenate the existing asphalt and preserve it," and explained crews will spread additional chips to fill tire paths and may perform spot patching through August.
The exchange focused on three practical questions: whether the initial chip-seal timing was affected by weather; what alternatives (and costs) exist between the current treatment and a full overlay; and how the county communicates schedules to residents. The engineer acknowledged that weather likely played a role and said some roads in the county receive chip seal because the budget cannot support widespread asphalt overlays.
Supervisors and the caller discussed traffic counts and classification of Pleasant Plain Road (counts reported in the 800–1,200 vehicles-per-day range for several nearby roads), and engineers said major reconstruction is unlikely in the county's seven-year program without new funding. One supervisor noted that a 3-inch overlay done in 2011 for a similar stretch cost about $1 million at that time and estimated that the same work would cost substantially more now.
The board did not amend the project plan at the meeting but said staff will provide better advance notice of upcoming chip-spreading operations, consider additional mitigation work such as spot patching, and provide cost comparisons offline for possible further study.
What's next: The county will continue chip-spreading through August and said it will provide as much advance notice as possible for any work that requires flagging or lane closures. Residents were told they have two years from the incident date to contact the county about damage claims related to chip-seal materials.
