Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Poll Watchers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents complain about poll watchers and suggest accreditation; officials describe existing rules
Summary
During public comment, residents alleged improper interaction between a senator and a candidate and said poll watchers were speaking to voters; elections staff said poll watchers must be accredited by party designation and guidebooks are provided, and the board discussed possible sign-off or training.
Public comment at the canvass meeting focused on concerns about poll-watcher behavior and an allegation that a Republican senator spoke with a candidate while voters were present.
Speaker 3 criticized conduct at the polling place and said the treatment of the local election official was unacceptable: "We can't let her be treated like that. ... They broke ethics on it." The comment included an allegation that a senator had spoken with a candidate while voters were entering.
Speaker 2, who provided the vote totals earlier in the meeting, described the existing accreditation process for poll watchers: "They have to be accredited, which means that the party has to fill out some sort of designation form. It doesn't have to be the 1 prescribed by the secretary of state." Speaker 2 added that guidebooks explaining what poll watchers can and cannot do are sent to each polling location for every election.
During the discussion participants suggested simple administrative options to reduce conflict, such as having poll watchers sign an acknowledgement that they have read the rules before observing. Speaker 3 proposed: "If these 3 are gonna poll watch, they just sign something said said they read it." Speaker 2 said she could look into options but saw no current legal requirement to require an additional sign-in beyond party accreditation.
The transcript records these concerns and a discussion of administrative remedies but does not record formal disciplinary action, an ethics finding, or a follow-up directive beyond the staffs offer to explore options.
