Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Richmond Board accepts proof of publication and adopts Resolution 1-2026 on administrative processing fees for unsafe-building enforcement

Board of Public Works and Safety, Richmond City · January 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After accepting proof of publication and hearing no public comment, the Board of Public Works and Safety approved Resolution 1-2026 to establish administrative processing expenses for the Unsafe Building Commission and city enforcement authority.

The Richmond Board of Public Works and Safety accepted proof of publication and approved Resolution 1-2026 at its Jan. 8 meeting. Speaker 2 introduced the proof of publication and Speaker 5 summarized that the notice included the time, date, place and agenda items for the public hearing concerning Resolution 1-2026.

Speaker 5 told the board: "This proof of publication shows that the publication was published in advance. It states the time, date, place, and the items on the agenda for the public hearing concerning the housekeeping, establishment of administrative processing expenses within resolution 1 20 26." After the board accepted the proof of publication, Speaker 2 opened the public hearing for Resolution 1-2026 and invited those wishing to speak in favor or opposition to come forward. "Hearing and seeing none," Speaker 2 closed the public hearing; Speaker 1 moved to approve Resolution 1-2026, a second was recorded, and the board approved the resolution by voice vote.

Why it matters: Resolution 1-2026 establishes administrative processing expenses tied to enforcement by the Unsafe Building Commission; the policy defines fees and supports enforcement actions by the city.

What’s next: The resolution was approved on Jan. 8. The transcript records no public commenters at the hearing and does not specify an effective date beyond the board’s approval.