Resident criticism of development, asphalt plant and planning draws board response

Several public commentators addressed land‑use and quality‑of‑life concerns at the Dec. 16 Henrico County Board of Supervisors meeting.

Jennifer Lieberman offered extended remarks criticizing recent decisions on road resurfacing, development approvals, an asphalt plant, a solar farm on a former landfill and perceived lack of health‑infrastructure planning, and urged the board to use eminent‑domain tools and alternative ideas for reuse of county land. Lieberman said she was concerned about pollution, traffic and taxation effects of development and asked the board to reconsider its approach.

Supervisor Nelson and other board members responded directly from the dais. Nelson noted the board's record and invited Lieberman and other residents to speak with planning staff to obtain a fuller picture of development reviews and to avoid relying on single social‑media posts for information. "I sat here and listened to you respectfully even though I disagree with what you're saying," Nelson said, and recommended additional research and engagement with staff.

The exchange highlights resident unease about particular projects and the board's approach to outreach and review; staff suggested meetings and further follow‑up for detailed technical questions about individual projects. The board's procedural response emphasized that planning staff and the county attorney are available to provide detailed information to concerned residents.

What happens next: Board members encouraged the speaker to meet with staff. No formal board action resulted from the public comment that evening.