Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vetoed state match forces STIP revisions, DOT says it can bridge near-term delivery
Summary
DOT told legislators a $58 million reduction in state match from the governor's veto required STIP amendment and reduced near‑term project throughput; DOT said it expects to sustain delivery through July using advanced construction balances but the post‑July outlook depends on restoring match.
Get email alerts on the Budget Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities told the Senate Transportation Committee on Thursday that a governor's veto of match appropriations reduced available state match by $58,000,000 and required revisions to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
Dom Pinon, director of program management and administration at DOT, said the vetoed reduction forced DOT to revise its fiscal-constraint tables and move some projects to later years in STIP Amendment 2. “The reduction was, $58,000,000,” Pinon said on the record.
Pinon and Commissioner Ryan Anderson described mitigation strategies: relying on the department's advanced construction (AC) balance (Anderson said the AC balance is roughly $570,000,000), sequencing projects, prioritizing shovel-ready work and pursuing a supplemental appropriation request to restore match. Pinon said DOT requested a supplemental appropriation of $69,000,000 in the governor's proposed budget to capture August redistribution funding.
“To maximize the August redistribution opportunity we need additional match,” Pinon said, noting DOT captured $183,000,000 in an August redistribution last year and that FHWA recently indicated an initial $64,000,000 allocation to the state this cycle.
Legislators pressed DOT on timing and cash flow: whether available funds could have been used earlier, how advanced construction is converted to federal obligations, and what the impacts would be to contractors if match is not restored. Anderson said DOT has enough match to sustain current planned advertising and delivery through June and into July but acknowledged that after July project delivery becomes uncertain without restored match.
Anderson said Amendment 2 was changed after public notice because the veto reduced the match assumed in public materials (Pinon said the revised match shown was roughly $75,000,000). DOT told the committee it is in discussions with FHWA about whether showing a supplemental appropriation in the STIP would allow those projects to be reintroduced without further delay.
The committee indicated it will take up deeper budget questions in upcoming finance hearings and requested written detail from DOT on the specific STIP changes and project delivery impacts.
