Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Flower Hill trustees refer restaurant plan to zoning, schedule hearings on land‑use fee and density laws
Summary
The Village of Flower Hill Board of Trustees referred a restaurant site-plan to the zoning board and set June 2 public hearings on a proposed law to let applicants reimburse village review costs and on average‑density subdivisions intended to preserve open space.
The Village of Flower Hill Board of Trustees on May 5 referred a site‑plan application for the Lemani Restaurant to the village zoning board and scheduled public hearings next month on two proposed local laws affecting land use. Trustees said referral to zoning and, where applicable, the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) is appropriate before the board takes further action.
Trustees described the restaurant application as including a parking‑variance request and a neighbor agreement to allow an evening pass‑through to help with parking. Board members said they did not intend to act tonight and expected the zoning board or BZA decisions to affect any future board consideration.
Separately the board advanced a proposed local law that would permit the village to require land‑use applicants for large projects to reimburse the village for consultant and review expenses — for example, hiring engineers or environmental reviewers. Trustees said the change is targeted at large‑scale developments and would not apply to routine homeowner work. The draft law includes a required deposit model that must be replenished if costs deplete the fund and would bar issuance of completion certificates until fees are paid.
The board also scheduled a second public hearing for June 2 on a separate proposed local law authorizing average‑density subdivisions, a tool trustees said would allow dwelling units to be concentrated on the parts of a large parcel best suited for development while preserving substantial open space elsewhere. Trustees used an example of a hypothetical closed golf course to explain how the tool would retain green space while permitting compact development on buildable areas.
All three items were set for additional public consideration on June 2; trustees and staff directed counsel to prepare draft language and to circulate it to the board in advance of the hearings. The board did not adopt any of the proposed local laws at the May 5 meeting.
