Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Student Clubs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Heated public comment at Royal Oak Schools over proposed Turning Point USA high-school club
Summary
At a Nov. 13 Royal Oak Schools board meeting, dozens of residents, parents and students debated whether a Turning Point USA chapter should be allowed at Royal Oak High School, with opponents citing safety concerns for LGBTQ+ students and supporters framing the issue as free-speech protection; the board said district policy and the law require equal access for student clubs.
Royal Oak Schools held a regularly scheduled Board of Education meeting on Nov. 13, 2025, where extended public comment focused on the proposed formation of a Turning Point USA (TPUSA) student club at Royal Oak High School.
In opening remarks the board signaled its legal constraint and its commitment to inclusion, saying the district must follow federal law and board policy and "make sure all students have the opportunity to explore their interest, ideas, and personal views in a safe, respectful environment." The statement also said the district cannot prevent a student club from forming without risking litigation.
The first public-comment block brought sharply divided views. Several speakers defended the principle of free expression and the board's statement; one longtime resident said the community had moved to Royal Oak for its reputation for tolerance and "applaud[ed]" the board's openness. Supporters said clubs, including conservative ones, belong in schools as part of civic education.
Opponents pressed safety and oversight concerns at length. Parent and mental-health professional Anne Abbey urged a formal policy review and stronger monitoring, saying that "documented patterns of behavior tied to Turning Point USA ... raise legitimate safety concerns for protected student groups, including trans students, students of color, and LGBT youth." Abbey cited the Equal Access Act as governing student clubs but asked the district to evaluate whether TPUSA-aligned activity could create hostile environments for marginalized students.
Several parents and students described a recent walkout and online harassment. Student Braxton Romano, who identified himself as a junior and a member of the club, described receiving bullying messages and said he and other club founders reported threats to administrators: "On October 28 ... the district told me the online harassment was not found to be credible." Romano asked the board to apply rules evenly and monitor behavior.
Other speakers raised concerns based on TPUSA materials and chapter requirements. Former teacher Ashley Murrell cited language in TPUSA guidance that she said requires frequent contact with TPUSA staff, officers asserting they are 18, and local social-media accounts that TPUSA can claim as organizational property; she asked whether the chapter would truly be student-led and how the district would ensure staff and student safety.
Board members did not act to ban or approve a club during the meeting. Multiple board motions unrelated to the club (donation acceptance, proclamations, a Chicago music trip, policy first readings, and personnel approvals) were moved and adopted as shown in the meeting minutes. The board's public statement and multiple speakers repeatedly referenced the Equal Access Act and Title IX when discussing legal constraints and protections.
Student representative Grace Hinton told the board that student voices are "being echoed by the adults in our community" and encouraged more direct student engagement in future meetings. After public comment concluded, the meeting continued with DEI and curriculum reports, facilities and bond planning, and personnel items before adjourning at 8:43 p.m.
The board did not announce a formal policy change or next steps specific to TPUSA during the meeting; several public speakers asked the district to conduct a formal policy review and to clarify monitoring and intervention procedures in writing.
