Staff recommends 10-year, 60% tax abatement for Stellar Energy’s proposed Fort Worth plant

Fort Worth City council · January 28, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff recommended a 10-year, 60% tax abatement for Stellar Energy Americas to build a modular-cooling manufacturing facility in the Alliance area, contingent on roughly $80 million in capital investment and creation of 1,420 jobs by 2027; council asked a brief clarifying question about the project’s council district.

City economic-development staff recommended the council enter a 10-year, 60% property-tax abatement for Stellar Energy Americas to build a modular cooling-equipment facility on Blue Mound Road in the Alliance Westport 24 development.

Shree Gordon, presenting the item, described the proposal as a fast-moving project with strict performance timelines: “The company is committing to a minimum capital investment of approximately 80,000,000 by 12/31/2026 and…1,420 full time jobs by 12/31/2027,” she said. Gordon said the jobs would be a mix of line workers and engineering positions with an average salary of $78,000 and that the abatement would be subject to default and forfeiture if Stellar failed to meet investment, job or salary commitments.

Staff estimated the investment would generate about $4.7 million in taxes and calculated the proposed city participation at roughly 2.6% (staff displayed a staff-recommended 60% abatement over 10 years). Amber Shaver, Stellar’s chief administrative and legal officer, and Jonathan Jenkins of Moore Partners attended the presentation.

Why this matters: Staff framed the abatement as aligned with Fort Worth’s target industry strategy and a large private investment that would create payroll and jobs locally. The presentation included a 30-day public-notice period that began Jan. 7 and a scheduled Municipal Neighborhood Corporation (MNC) consideration on Feb. 10.

Council response: Councilmembers asked minimal clarifying questions; Councilmember Flores asked which council district the site was in and staff answered it is in District 10.

Next steps: Staff recommended formal abatement paperwork and MNC consideration; any agreement would include performance and clawback language, and would return with required approvals before any abatement is finalized.