Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the CRAs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Saint George official urges uniform rules for CRA property sales, including thresholds and notice
Summary
St. George Government Affairs Director Sean Guzman told the committee that Community Reinvestment Agencies (CRAs) sometimes escape city disposal requirements when property is transferred to a CRA and urged uniform notice, RFP/RFQ timelines, and consistent treatment of trust‑land disposals.
The committee heard from Sean Guzman, Government Affairs Director for the City of St. George, about transparency gaps when cities transfer property into Community Reinvestment Agencies.
Guzman said CRAs can become separate legal owners of parcels assembled by a city and that those transfers can create a loophole in disposal and advertising practices. "Even though our mayor and council serves as the board of the CRA, oftentimes the property is transferred into the ownership of that CRA and therefore becomes property of the CRA and not the city," Guzman told the committee.
He recommended uniform rules for disposing of CRA‑owned parcels, including a statewide threshold for what constitutes a "significant parcel" (St. George uses $500,000 as its local benchmark) and an escalator to account for rising property values. Guzman also proposed a 90‑day listing or RFP requirement or other standard notice to give adjacent jurisdictions and potential bidders adequate time to respond.
Guzman noted one statutory constraint: a Utah Supreme Court decision (referred to in the hearing as the "Short decision") requires that cities receive fair market value but allows consideration of nonmonetary public benefits when valuing property — for example, lowering a price in exchange for long‑term affordable housing commitments. He described Riverwalk Apartments as a local example where a discounted transfer produced required affordable units with a long‑term affordability obligation.
The city official also asked that any new transparency requirements for city CRAs apply equally to state trust lands, because trust‑land disposals sometimes occur quickly in ways that give nearby municipalities less notice.
The committee thanked Guzman and said staff and sponsors would continue reviewing statutory language to improve transparency and uniformity in property disposal by CRAs and related entities.
