Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Building Codes Adoption topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee adopts HB 65 to update building codes; immediate effect sought for concrete savings

Utah House Business, Labor and Commerce Committee · January 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee unanimously adopted the second substitute of HB 65 to adopt the 2024 international model building codes with targeted immediate-effect provisions aimed at reducing concrete costs for tilt‑up construction and avoiding project delays.

Representative Thomas Peterson presented HB 65, a second substitute that would adopt the 2024 international model codes (IBC, IMC, IPC and related codes) into Utah law and add the previously omitted International Swimming Pool and Spa Code. Peterson said certain provisions, notably a new ACI (American Concrete Institute) standard adopted in the model codes for tilt‑up construction, could produce "millions of dollars" in savings and that the bill seeks the votes required to make those portions effective upon the governor's signature to prevent a gap that could stall projects.

Industry witnesses told the committee they support the measure. Joey Gilbert of the Associated General Contractors explained that the ACI changes allow lighter tilt‑up panels by reducing required steel/rebar and thus lowering construction costs. "By putting this in code now and having it signed by the governor instantly, you won't create a donut hole waiting for the approval of the bill," Gilbert said.

Committee members asked whether adopting the ICC codes would increase costs; Representative Peterson and witnesses said the changes are largely cost‑neutral overall but include targeted savings in concrete design. Other amendments in the substitute update glazing and ballistics standards to performance-based defeat-rate measures.

Representative Jim Dunnigan moved to adopt the substitute; the committee later voted to pass HB 65 as amended with a favorable recommendation. The motion passed unanimously and the bill will advance to further House consideration.

Why this matters: adopting the newest model codes can alter design standards, which affects material use, construction cost and project schedules. The committee emphasized both cost and timing implications when portions are made effective immediately upon enactment.