Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sitla Cultural Sites topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves bill letting counties nominate culturally significant SITLA sites

House Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment Committee · January 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HB 64 would create a nomination framework allowing counties to identify up to two culturally or scientifically significant sites on SITLA trust lands (up to 640 acres) for protective consideration; SITLA and land-trust advocates supported the collaborative approach and the committee passed the bill out.

Representative Carl Albrecht introduced HB 64 to create a structured process for counties to notify and nominate culturally or scientifically significant sites on School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) property. Albrecht said the bill is the result of months of negotiation to balance SITLA’s fiduciary mandate to generate revenue for beneficiaries and local communities’ interest in protecting particular cultural sites such as Promise Rock in Garfield County.

Michelle McConkie, SITLA director, described the measure as a collaboration tool that would improve communication with counties and communities about special areas while preserving SITLA’s statutory mission. The bill allows each county to nominate up to two sites and includes a 24-month window for counties to respond following director notification; the bill excludes mineral-development parcels from nomination when development would be materially affected.

Land-trust advocates and county leaders who testified online praised the compromise and emphasized the cultural value of specific sites. The committee voted to pass HB 64 with a favorable recommendation.